Skip to main content

Landscapes of Energies, a Perspective on the Energy Transition

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses the way in which cross-national comparison shall be approached. We assume that energy landscapes emerge at the crossroad of RE technology development and changes in current landscapes. We successively discuss different frameworks for approaching technology development and landscape change, before turning to the recent literature about landscape and renewable energy development. We conclude that cross-national comparison of landscapes of energies should be attentive to the type of landscape tradition at work in each country and account for the fact that the development of renewable energy endows these traditions with a renewed existence. Depending on the extent and the focus of the conflicts or controversies raised around RE projects, the method and focus of the analysis shall differ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    What follows is inspired by Nadaï and Van der Horst (2010).

  2. 2.

    Hybrid geographies emphasize the blurring of the nature-culture divide because of the development of new (bio-) technologies. It subsequently pushes a symmetric agenda questioning the naturalness of space.

References

  • Akrich M (1989) La construction d’un système socio-technique. Esquisse pour une anthropologie des techniques. Anthropologie et Sociétés 13(2):31. doi:10.7202/015076ar

  • Bonta M (2005) Becoming-forest, becoming-local: transformations of a protected area in Honduras. Geoforum 36(1):95–112. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosley P, Bosley K (1990) California wind energy development: environmental support and opposition. Energy Environ 11(2):171–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosley P, Bosley K (1992) Risks and benefits of wind generated electricity: facts and perceptions. Energy Sour 14:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brian Arthur W (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99(394):116. doi:10.2307/2234208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlman I (1986) Public opinion on the use of wind power in Sweden. In: Proceedings of European wind energy conference. Bookshop for Scientific Publications, Rome, pp 569–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B, Stankiewicz R (1991) On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. J Evol Econ 1(2):93–118. doi:10.1007/BF01224915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove DE (1998) Social formation and symbolic landscape. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove DE, Daniels S (1998) The iconography of landscape. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell R (2010) Wind power, landscape and strategic, spatial planning—the construction of ‘acceptable Locations’ in Wales. For Trans Wind Power Plan Landsc Publics 27(2):222–232. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.01.006

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright P, Devine-Wright H (2006) Social representations of intermittency and the shaping of public support for wind energy in the UK. Int J Global Energy Issues 25(3–4):243–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants of technological change. Res Policy 11:147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan J, Duncan N (1988) (Re)reading the landscape. Environ Plan D Soc Space 6(2):117–126. doi:10.1068/d060117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foray D, Freeman F (1992) Technologie et richesse des Nations. Economica, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Frolova M (2010) Landscapes, water policy and the evolution of discourses on hydropower in Spain. Landsc Res 35(2):235–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31(8–9):1257–1274. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grübler A, Nakićenović N, Victor DG (1999) Dynamics of energy technologies and global change. Energy Policy 27(5):247–280. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00067-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggett C (2008) Over the sea and far away? A consideration of the planning, politics and public perception of offshore wind farms. J Environ Policy Plann 10(3):289–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggett C, Toke D (2006) Crossing the great divide—using multi-method analysis to understand opposition to windfarms. Public Adm 84(1):103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch E, O’Hanlon M (eds) (1995) The anthropology of landscape: perspectives on place and space. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes T (1986) The seamless web: science, technology, etcetera, etcetera. Soc Stud Sci 16(2):281–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huitjs N, Midden C, Meijnders A (2007) Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage. Energy Policy 35(5):2780–2789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JB (1997) Landscape in sight: looking at America. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolivet E, Heiskanen E (2010) Blowing against the wind–an exploratory application of actor network theory to the analysis of local controversies and participation processes in wind energy. Energy Policy 38(11):6746–6754. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss W (2010) The ‘dingpolitik’ of wind energy in northern German landscapes: an ethnographic case study. Landsc Res 35(2):195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer H (2005) Cultural geography: the busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’. Prog Hum Geogr 29(1):83–94. doi:10.1191/0309132505ph531pr

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B (1992) National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers, London, New York, distributed exclusively in the USA and Canada by St. Martin’s Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadaï A (2007) ‘Planning’, ‘siting’ and the local acceptance of wind power: some lessons from the French case. Energy Policy 35(5):2715–2726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadaï A (2012) Planning with the missing masses: innovative wind power planning in France. In: Szarka J, Cowell R, Ellis G, Strachan P, Warren C (eds) Learning from wind power: governance, societal and policy perspectives on sustainable energy. MacMillan, Palgrave, Basingstoke, Hampshire (UK), p 280

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadaï A, Labussière O (2010) Birds, wind and the making of wind power landscapes in Aude, southern France. Landsc Res 35(2):209–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadaï A, Labussière O (2013) Playing with the line, channelling multiplicity: wind power planning in the Narbonnaise (Aude, France). Environ Plan D Soc Space 31(1):116–139. doi:10.1068/d22610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadaï A, Labussière O (2015) Wind power and the emergence of the Beauce landscape (Eure-et-Loir, France). Landsc Res 40(1):76–98. doi:10.1080/01426397.2013.784732, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01426397.2013.784732?journalCode=clar20#.VPA1e47LKWl

  • Nadaï A, van der Horst D (2010) Introduction: landscapes of energies (Guest editorial). Landsc Res 35(2):143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadaï A, Krauss W, Afonso AI, Dracklé D, Hinkelbein O, Labussiere O, Mendes C (2010) El paisaje y la transición energética: Comparando el surgimiento de paisajes de energía eólica en Francia, Alemania y Portugal. Nimbus 25–26:155–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadaï A, Krauss W, Afonso AI, Dracklé D, Hinkelbein O, Labussière O, Mendes C (2013) Une comparaison de l’émergence de paysages éoliens en France, Allemagne et Portugal. In: Terrasson D, Luginbuhl Y (eds) Paysage et Développement Durable. Quae, Versailles, pp 157–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Winter S (1977) In search of a useful theory of innovation’. Res Policy 6:36–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR (1993) National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, New York and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. The political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig KR (1996) Recovering the substantive nature of landscape. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 86(4):630–653. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1996.tb01770.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig KR (2002) Landscape, nature, and the body politic: from Britain’s renaissance to America’s new world. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig KR (2005) Editorial: law, polity and the changing meaning of landscape. Landsc Res 30(3):293–298. doi:10.1080/01426390500165369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig KR (2007) The practice of landscape ‘Conventions’ and the just landscape: the case of the European landscape convention. Landsc Res 32(5):579–594. doi:10.1080/01426390701552738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens S (1985) Energy participation and planning: the case of electricity generation in Great Britain. In: Calzonetti FJ, Solomon BD (eds) Geographical dimensions of energy. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 225–254

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pasqualetti M (2011) Opposing wind energy landscapes: a search for common cause. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 101(4):907–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasqualetti M, Gipe P, Righter RW (2002) Wind power in view. Energy landscapes in a crowded world. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Prados MJ (2010a) ¿Energías renovables o agricultura? Un análisis de la percepción ciudadana sobre los huertos y latifundios solares en Andalucía. Nimbus 25–26:205–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Prados MJ (2010b) Renewable energy policy and landscape management in Andalusia, Spain: the facts. Energy Policy 38(11):6900–6909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose M (2002) Landscape and labyrinths. Geoforum 33(4):455–467. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00030-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose M, Wylie J (2006) Animating landscape. Environ Plann D Soc Space 24(4):475–479. doi:10.1068/d2404ed

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer CO (1963) Land and life. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Schot J, Geels FW (2008) Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technol Anal Strat Manag 20(5):537–554. doi:10.1080/09537320802292651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selman P (2010) Learning to love the landscapes of carbon-neutrality. Landsc Res 35(2):157–171. doi:10.1080/01426390903560414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suurs RAA (2009) Motors of sustainable innovation. Towards a theory on the dynamics of technological innovation systems. Utrecht University

    Google Scholar 

  • Szarka J (2004) Wind power, discourse coalitions and climate change: breaking the stalemate? Eur Environ 14(6):317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift N (2000) Afterwords. Environ Plan D: Soc Space 18(2):213–255. doi:10.1068/d214t

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift N (2004a) Movement-space: the changing domain of thinking resulting from the development of new kinds of spatial awareness. Econ Soc 33(4):582–604. doi:10.1080/0308514042000285305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift N (2004b) Afterwords. Environ Plann D Soc Space 18(2):213–255. doi:10.1068/d214t

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unruh GC (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12) (October, 1):817-830. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7

  • Van der Horst D (2007) NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy 35(5):2705–2714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Horst D, Toke D (2010) Exploring the landscape of wind farm developments, local area characteristics and planning process outcomes in rural England. Land Use Policy 27:214–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varley MJ, Davies TD, Bentham CG, Pautikof JP (1989) Local attitudes to three existing wind turbine in the UK. In: Swill-Hook DT (ed) Wind energy and the environment. Peregrinus, Stevenage, pp 146–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker G (1995) Renewable energy and the public. Land Use Policy 12(1):49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker G (2007) Public participation as participatory communication in environmental policy decision-making: from concepts to structured conversations. Environ Commun 1(1):99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren CR, Mcfadyen M (2010) Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study of ‘acceptable locations’ in Wales. Land Use Policy 27:204–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West J, Bailey I, Winter M (2010) Renewable energy policy and public perceptions of renewable energy: a cultural theory approach. Energy Policy 38(10):5739–5748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore S (2002) Hybrid geographies: natures, cultures, spaces. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner L (1980) Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109(1):121–136. doi:10.2307/20024652

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink M (1988) The social impact of a large wind turbine. Environ Impact Assess Rev 8:323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink M (2007) Planning of renewables schemes: deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energy Policy 35(5):2692–2704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods M (2003) Conflicting environmental visions of the rural, wind farm development in Mid-Wales. Sociol Rural 43(3):271–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wüstenhagen R, Schweizer-Ries P, Wemheuer C (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 35(5):2683–2691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoellner J, Schweizer-Ries P, Wemheuer C (2008) Public acceptance of renewable energies: results from case studies in Germany. Energy Policy 36(11):4136–4141

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain Nadaï .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nadaï, A., Prados, MJ. (2015). Landscapes of Energies, a Perspective on the Energy Transition. In: Frolova, M., Prados, MJ., Nadaï, A. (eds) Renewable Energies and European Landscapes. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9843-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9843-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9842-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9843-3

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics